Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jim Logie's avatar

Congratulations on a stellar article, Ross.

A few thoughts if I may?

For me, there is an even more profound central question - what is / should be the football philosophy of Celtic F.C. for the 21st century? What is our football identity/DNA (aka the "Why")

And how do we put in place and end-to-end corporate and operational structure to support and drive this philosophy - aka the "How".

This blueprint/ DNA must be visible -and measurableble - at every stage, from youth players to tactical recruitment of external signings who will fit our model - regardless of who the current Manager might be.

It should automatically extend to the Boardroom and dugout, with the Manager / Coaching team being hired by an appointed Director of Football against the same blueprint.

I think the club has shackled itself to a ceiling if self-imposed mediocrity at every level of executive function. The Board members are clearly not best of breed in their respective fields, and, like all mediocrity, they naturally resist any change or challenge to their limited skill set of vision as a means of self-defense. Its human nature not to draw attention to one"s own shortcomings, and it's just easier to go with the flow and do "just enough".....why try harder when there is apparently no penalty/reward for doing so?

This is even more pronounced at Academy level. We need to be brave enough to identify the best models and people, and do what we can within reason to replicate the key principles. And that will almost certainly mean looking beyond ML postcodes to hire people.

As Ross forcefully points out, we also need to find a clear opportunity to integrate Academy players into first team training/ action, and commit to giving minutes of action (I know that there are risks in short term results)

In my mind, the Director of Academy is an even more central role Tom Celtic than the first team Manager....this is where our future can be laboratory -grown to a precise recipe that makes us far less dependent upon the vagaries of the transfer market, which is only going to become ever more challenging and difficult in years to come.

By all means, go out and sign exceptional talent if and when it becomes available and fits out blueprint....but we should be brave and build for the next twenty years, not just the current or next season.

If the board can put together such a bold strategy and genuinely communicate the vision to upporters in a sincere and open manner (with mwasurablele KPIs) then I would hope that we could swallow a season or two of transition (which we are inevitably going to gave to suffer anyway in a post Rodgers re-build) to completely re-tool the club's talent pipeline and modus operandi .

I know that some of this might be wishful thinking, but how exciting and satisfying it would be to cheer on a team full of guys who are genuinely "one of our own"!

Rant over!

Expand full comment
Mo's avatar

Very thoughtful and well constructed assessment of where we are....and have been for far too long. However I have a few points.

We continually talk about Recruitment Dept doing there job. However how many times have we brought in players only for the Manager, in this case Brendan, to decide that they don't fit. How is that possible in a modern Club environment?

Where is the incentive for young and somewhat experienced professionals to sign if we dump them in Division 5 along with 17 yr olds, eg Inamura, Osmand.

What is the point of developing ANY young Player if we don't give them opportunities but would rather spend £6m or even £11m on a player who can't even get a 1st Team starting position? Would it be different if we had a Director of Football? I'm not convinced because it comes back to providing challenging levels of games at whatever level, Team selection and opportunities.

Our Club's development, particularly development of young players, is held back because anything other than winning SPFL is failure.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts